<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should we retire the name &#8216;classifieds&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reinventingclassifieds.com/2008/04/24/should-we-retire-the-name-classifieds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reinventingclassifieds.com/2008/04/24/should-we-retire-the-name-classifieds/</link>
	<description>Traditional classifieds are broken. Help us reinvent them.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.reinventingclassifieds.com/2008/04/24/should-we-retire-the-name-classifieds/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reinventingclassifieds.com/?p=33#comment-11</guid>
		<description>The Denver newspapers renamed their classifieds "Marketplace". Great idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Denver newspapers renamed their classifieds &#8220;Marketplace&#8221;. Great idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.reinventingclassifieds.com/2008/04/24/should-we-retire-the-name-classifieds/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reinventingclassifieds.com/?p=33#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think a project of redefining the classified is in danger of losing focus. I understand the desire to become a social networking site. There is power in making people need you. But a newspaper risks losing it's identity in the process. Honestly, I dislike using craigslist because it's getting full up with spam and the shear volume of stuff makes it an afternoon adventure to browse. A newspaper's identity is as a spam-less, finite source of ads. I can browse the classifieds in a paper in 20 minutes. Try doing that with craigslist.

Incidentally, I'm worried that this project casts out rhetoric in the name of blowing the box off what we think about classifieds and how to change them, without offering any real solution. You can say "It's certainly not just the printed and online listings," but what is "bringing people together to do business?" In the end, the best form of communication we, as media types have is printed or online listings. If we leave our office to talk with people and interact, we need some way to communicate what we're doing. So we turn around and "publish" it online or in a paper.

I think the classified in idea, if not in letter, will be around longer than people would like to believe. Perhaps it wont be the cash cow it used to be, but what if instead of being a cash cow it was considered a gateway to get people to use a website or to read a paper. When someone is looking at advertisements in the auto classification, maybe we need to throw a link in which leads to our story about that crazy car wreck two months ago. When they click on the story to read more, *bam* there's a current ad for an auto dealership and a link to their website where their cars are offered with dealer guarantees at only a little bit more than the classified prices. 

Then again, maybe they wont click through and the classified will get the win. That needs to happen sometimes, otherwise who would take out a classified? It's all balance, and it's a function of how much money you *need* to get from an ad (classified or targeted) and how much you *want* to get. I suppose *want* could also be replaced with *feel you ought*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think a project of redefining the classified is in danger of losing focus. I understand the desire to become a social networking site. There is power in making people need you. But a newspaper risks losing it&#8217;s identity in the process. Honestly, I dislike using craigslist because it&#8217;s getting full up with spam and the shear volume of stuff makes it an afternoon adventure to browse. A newspaper&#8217;s identity is as a spam-less, finite source of ads. I can browse the classifieds in a paper in 20 minutes. Try doing that with craigslist.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I&#8217;m worried that this project casts out rhetoric in the name of blowing the box off what we think about classifieds and how to change them, without offering any real solution. You can say &#8220;It&#8217;s certainly not just the printed and online listings,&#8221; but what is &#8220;bringing people together to do business?&#8221; In the end, the best form of communication we, as media types have is printed or online listings. If we leave our office to talk with people and interact, we need some way to communicate what we&#8217;re doing. So we turn around and &#8220;publish&#8221; it online or in a paper.</p>
<p>I think the classified in idea, if not in letter, will be around longer than people would like to believe. Perhaps it wont be the cash cow it used to be, but what if instead of being a cash cow it was considered a gateway to get people to use a website or to read a paper. When someone is looking at advertisements in the auto classification, maybe we need to throw a link in which leads to our story about that crazy car wreck two months ago. When they click on the story to read more, *bam* there&#8217;s a current ad for an auto dealership and a link to their website where their cars are offered with dealer guarantees at only a little bit more than the classified prices. </p>
<p>Then again, maybe they wont click through and the classified will get the win. That needs to happen sometimes, otherwise who would take out a classified? It&#8217;s all balance, and it&#8217;s a function of how much money you *need* to get from an ad (classified or targeted) and how much you *want* to get. I suppose *want* could also be replaced with *feel you ought*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

